Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors

Haciendo trampas:
1º Si en esa placa con el FX60 lo da como Unknown es que es un bios antigua y segun esto la primera:
http://us.dfi.com.tw/Support/Downlo...mp;SITE=NA
Y si nos fijamos en las correciones de la siguiente bios hay 3 mosqueantes:
10. Add support K8 FX60 CPU.
1. Fix memory Set 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 mode wrong. Memoria con latencia erronea
2. Set Cool'n'Quiet default disable. Los AMD en este modo son mas lentos.

Por lo tanto es un Test para tirarlo a la basura.

Saludos.


De: "jmt" <jmtella>
Asunto: Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors
Fecha: miércoles, 08 de marzo de 2006 21:10


Intel has just revealed more details concerning its next-generation computer processors. The 'Core Microarchitecture' will replace
NetBurst based offerings from Intel in the second half of this year trying in an attempt to catch up with AMD, who have undoubtedly
won the recent round of chip battles, especially in the area of physical multi-core processors.

"The Intel Core microarchitecture is a milestone in enabling scalable performance and energy efficiency," said Intel Senior Fellow
and chief technology officer John Rattner. "Later this year it will fuel new dual-core processors and quad-core processors in 2007
that we expect to deliver industry leading performance and capabilities per watt. People will see systems that can be faster,
smaller and quieter with longer battery life and lower electric bills."

In his keynote address at this year's Intel Developer Forum, Rattner showed how the Conroe desktop processor could provide roughly a
40 percent boost in performance and a 40 percent decrease in power as compared to Intel's current high-performing Intel® Pentium® D
950 processor. Other notable features in this round of chips from Intel include the ability to process 4 instructions per clock
cycle as compared to 3 with Core-Duo chips, smarter L2 cache, and improved data pre-fetch algorithms.


Several technology sites have managed to get time in on the new Intel hardware a full four months before they are expected in the
marketplace, and the results look promising. Hexus and Anandtech for example, looked at a new 2.6 GHz Intel 'Conroe' desktop
processor and compared it to a tweaked dual-core AMD FX-60 processor running at future FX-62 speeds. Obviously Intel trounced the
AMD offering in every test Intel allowed them to run, but both sites came to the same conclusion: AMD has something to serious worry
about.


http://www.intel.com/pressroom/arch...07corp.htm
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.p...amp;page=1
http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i'13&p=1

jmt

Eso a AMD se la pela, lo que importa es que sigue ascendiendo su cotización,
y así nos repercute a los accionistas. Con eso me basta a mí.

"GM=Intel + Pronto" wrote:

Haciendo trampas:
1º Si en esa placa con el FX60 lo da como Unknown es que es un bios antigua y segun esto la primera:
http://us.dfi.com.tw/Support/Downlo...mp;SITE=NA
Y si nos fijamos en las correciones de la siguiente bios hay 3 mosqueantes:
10. Add support K8 FX60 CPU.
1. Fix memory Set 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 mode wrong. Memoria con latencia erronea
2. Set Cool'n'Quiet default disable. Los AMD en este modo son mas lentos.

Por lo tanto es un Test para tirarlo a la basura.

Saludos.


De: "jmt" <jmtella>
Asunto: Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors
Fecha: miércoles, 08 de marzo de 2006 21:10


Intel has just revealed more details concerning its next-generation computer processors. The 'Core Microarchitecture' will
replace
NetBurst based offerings from Intel in the second half of this year trying in an attempt to catch up with AMD, who have
undoubtedly
won the recent round of chip battles, especially in the area of physical multi-core processors.

"The Intel Core microarchitecture is a milestone in enabling scalable performance and energy efficiency," said Intel Senior
Fellow
and chief technology officer John Rattner. "Later this year it will fuel new dual-core processors and quad-core processors in
2007
that we expect to deliver industry leading performance and capabilities per watt. People will see systems that can be faster,
smaller and quieter with longer battery life and lower electric bills."

In his keynote address at this year's Intel Developer Forum, Rattner showed how the Conroe desktop processor could provide
roughly a
40 percent boost in performance and a 40 percent decrease in power as compared to Intel's current high-performing Intel® Pentium®
D
950 processor. Other notable features in this round of chips from Intel include the ability to process 4 instructions per clock
cycle as compared to 3 with Core-Duo chips, smarter L2 cache, and improved data pre-fetch algorithms.


Several technology sites have managed to get time in on the new Intel hardware a full four months before they are expected in the
marketplace, and the results look promising. Hexus and Anandtech for example, looked at a new 2.6 GHz Intel 'Conroe' desktop
processor and compared it to a tweaked dual-core AMD FX-60 processor running at future FX-62 speeds. Obviously Intel trounced the
AMD offering in every test Intel allowed them to run, but both sites came to the same conclusion: AMD has something to serious
worry
about.


http://www.intel.com/pressroom/arch...07corp.htm
http://www.hexus.net/content/item.p...amp;page=1
http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i'13&p=1

jmt

A eso precisamente me referia, pero el ton_to de Tella no lo ve asi.

Saludos.


-
"G. Jandía" escribió en el mensaje news:
> Eso a AMD se la pela, lo que importa es que sigue ascendiendo su cotización,
> y así nos repercute a los accionistas. Con eso me basta a mí.
>
> "GM=Intel + Pronto" wrote:
>
>>
>> Haciendo trampas:
>> 1º Si en esa placa con el FX60 lo da como Unknown es que es un bios antigua y segun esto la primera:
>> http://us.dfi.com.tw/Support/Downlo...mp;SITE=NA
>> Y si nos fijamos en las correciones de la siguiente bios hay 3 mosqueantes:
>> 10. Add support K8 FX60 CPU.
>> 1. Fix memory Set 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 mode wrong. Memoria con latencia erronea
>> 2. Set Cool'n'Quiet default disable. Los AMD en este modo son mas lentos.
>>
>> Por lo tanto es un Test para tirarlo a la basura.
>>
>> Saludos.
>>
>>
>> De: "jmt" <jmtella>
>> Asunto: Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors
>> Fecha: miércoles, 08 de marzo de 2006 21:10
>>
>>
>> Intel has just revealed more details concerning its next-generation computer processors. The 'Core Microarchitecture' will
>> replace
>> NetBurst based offerings from Intel in the second half of this year trying in an attempt to catch up with AMD, who have
>> undoubtedly
>> won the recent round of chip battles, especially in the area of physical multi-core processors.
>>
>> "The Intel Core microarchitecture is a milestone in enabling scalable performance and energy efficiency," said Intel Senior
>> Fellow
>> and chief technology officer John Rattner. "Later this year it will fuel new dual-core processors and quad-core processors in
>> 2007
>> that we expect to deliver industry leading performance and capabilities per watt. People will see systems that can be faster,
>> smaller and quieter with longer battery life and lower electric bills."
>>
>> In his keynote address at this year's Intel Developer Forum, Rattner showed how the Conroe desktop processor could provide
>> roughly a
>> 40 percent boost in performance and a 40 percent decrease in power as compared to Intel's current high-performing Intel® Pentium®
>> D
>> 950 processor. Other notable features in this round of chips from Intel include the ability to process 4 instructions per clock
>> cycle as compared to 3 with Core-Duo chips, smarter L2 cache, and improved data pre-fetch algorithms.
>>
>>
>> Several technology sites have managed to get time in on the new Intel hardware a full four months before they are expected in the
>> marketplace, and the results look promising. Hexus and Anandtech for example, looked at a new 2.6 GHz Intel 'Conroe' desktop
>> processor and compared it to a tweaked dual-core AMD FX-60 processor running at future FX-62 speeds. Obviously Intel trounced the
>> AMD offering in every test Intel allowed them to run, but both sites came to the same conclusion: AMD has something to serious
>> worry
>> about.
>>
>>
>> http://www.intel.com/pressroom/arch...07corp.htm
>> http://www.hexus.net/content/item.p...amp;page=1
>> http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i'13&p=1
>>
>> jmt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Simplemente veo mis beneficios y
digo, "paso de discutir con este tio", y nos tomamos unas cañas y hablar de
otra cosa :)

A eso precisamente me referia, pero el ton_to de Tella no lo ve asi.

Saludos.


-
"G. Jandía" escribió en el mensaje news:
> Eso a AMD se la pela, lo que importa es que sigue ascendiendo su cotización,
> y así nos repercute a los accionistas. Con eso me basta a mí.
>
> "GM=Intel + Pronto" wrote:
>
>>
>> Haciendo trampas:
>> 1º Si en esa placa con el FX60 lo da como Unknown es que es un bios antigua y segun esto la primera:
>> http://us.dfi.com.tw/Support/Downlo...mp;SITE=NA
>> Y si nos fijamos en las correciones de la siguiente bios hay 3 mosqueantes:
>> 10. Add support K8 FX60 CPU.
>> 1. Fix memory Set 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 mode wrong. Memoria con latencia erronea
>> 2. Set Cool'n'Quiet default disable. Los AMD en este modo son mas lentos.
>>
>> Por lo tanto es un Test para tirarlo a la basura.
>>
>> Saludos.
>>
>>
>> De: "jmt" <jmtella>
>> Asunto: Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors
>> Fecha: miércoles, 08 de marzo de 2006 21:10
>>
>>
>> Intel has just revealed more details concerning its next-generation computer processors. The 'Core Microarchitecture' will
>> replace
>> NetBurst based offerings from Intel in the second half of this year trying in an attempt to catch up with AMD, who have
>> undoubtedly
>> won the recent round of chip battles, especially in the area of physical multi-core processors.
>>
>> "The Intel Core microarchitecture is a milestone in enabling scalable performance and energy efficiency," said Intel Senior
>> Fellow
>> and chief technology officer John Rattner. "Later this year it will fuel new dual-core processors and quad-core processors in
>> 2007
>> that we expect to deliver industry leading performance and capabilities per watt. People will see systems that can be faster,
>> smaller and quieter with longer battery life and lower electric bills."
>>
>> In his keynote address at this year's Intel Developer Forum, Rattner showed how the Conroe desktop processor could provide
>> roughly a
>> 40 percent boost in performance and a 40 percent decrease in power as compared to Intel's current high-performing Intel® Pentium®
>> D
>> 950 processor. Other notable features in this round of chips from Intel include the ability to process 4 instructions per clock
>> cycle as compared to 3 with Core-Duo chips, smarter L2 cache, and improved data pre-fetch algorithms.
>>
>>
>> Several technology sites have managed to get time in on the new Intel hardware a full four months before they are expected in the
>> marketplace, and the results look promising. Hexus and Anandtech for example, looked at a new 2.6 GHz Intel 'Conroe' desktop
>> processor and compared it to a tweaked dual-core AMD FX-60 processor running at future FX-62 speeds. Obviously Intel trounced the
>> AMD offering in every test Intel allowed them to run, but both sites came to the same conclusion: AMD has something to serious
>> worry
>> about.
>>
>>
>> http://www.intel.com/pressroom/arch...07corp.htm
>> http://www.hexus.net/content/item.p...amp;page=1
>> http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i'13&p=1
>>
>> jmt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

A eso precisamente me referia, pero el ton_to de Tella no lo ve asi.

Saludos.


-
"G. Jandía" escribió en el mensaje news:
> Eso a AMD se la pela, lo que importa es que sigue ascendiendo su cotización,
> y así nos repercute a los accionistas. Con eso me basta a mí.
>
> "GM=Intel + Pronto" wrote:
>
>>
>> Haciendo trampas:
>> 1º Si en esa placa con el FX60 lo da como Unknown es que es un bios antigua y segun esto la primera:
>> http://us.dfi.com.tw/Support/Downlo...mp;SITE=NA
>> Y si nos fijamos en las correciones de la siguiente bios hay 3 mosqueantes:
>> 10. Add support K8 FX60 CPU.
>> 1. Fix memory Set 2-1-1-1-1 and 4-1-1 mode wrong. Memoria con latencia erronea
>> 2. Set Cool'n'Quiet default disable. Los AMD en este modo son mas lentos.
>>
>> Por lo tanto es un Test para tirarlo a la basura.
>>
>> Saludos.
>>
>>
>> De: "jmt" <jmtella>
>> Asunto: Intel Demonstrates New 'Microarchitecture' Processors
>> Fecha: miércoles, 08 de marzo de 2006 21:10
>>
>>
>> Intel has just revealed more details concerning its next-generation computer processors. The 'Core Microarchitecture' will
>> replace
>> NetBurst based offerings from Intel in the second half of this year trying in an attempt to catch up with AMD, who have
>> undoubtedly
>> won the recent round of chip battles, especially in the area of physical multi-core processors.
>>
>> "The Intel Core microarchitecture is a milestone in enabling scalable performance and energy efficiency," said Intel Senior
>> Fellow
>> and chief technology officer John Rattner. "Later this year it will fuel new dual-core processors and quad-core processors in
>> 2007
>> that we expect to deliver industry leading performance and capabilities per watt. People will see systems that can be faster,
>> smaller and quieter with longer battery life and lower electric bills."
>>
>> In his keynote address at this year's Intel Developer Forum, Rattner showed how the Conroe desktop processor could provide
>> roughly a
>> 40 percent boost in performance and a 40 percent decrease in power as compared to Intel's current high-performing Intel® Pentium®
>> D
>> 950 processor. Other notable features in this round of chips from Intel include the ability to process 4 instructions per clock
>> cycle as compared to 3 with Core-Duo chips, smarter L2 cache, and improved data pre-fetch algorithms.
>>
>>
>> Several technology sites have managed to get time in on the new Intel hardware a full four months before they are expected in the
>> marketplace, and the results look promising. Hexus and Anandtech for example, looked at a new 2.6 GHz Intel 'Conroe' desktop
>> processor and compared it to a tweaked dual-core AMD FX-60 processor running at future FX-62 speeds. Obviously Intel trounced the
>> AMD offering in every test Intel allowed them to run, but both sites came to the same conclusion: AMD has something to serious
>> worry
>> about.
>>
>>
>> http://www.intel.com/pressroom/arch...07corp.htm
>> http://www.hexus.net/content/item.p...amp;page=1
>> http://anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i'13&p=1
>>
>> jmt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>